ONC Crypto Loss Calculator
This tool calculates potential losses if you invested in ONC token at its all-time high versus current price. ONC has zero trading volume and no real utility according to recent reports.
ONC Token Value: -
Percentage Loss: -
Thereâs a crypto coin called Oncology Network (ONC) that claims to help fight cancer. Sounds noble, right? But if you dig deeper, what you find isnât a breakthrough in medical science-itâs a nearly dead token with no real use, no team, and almost no one trading it.
What ONC actually is (and isnât)
Oncology Network (ONC) is an ERC-20 token built on the Ethereum blockchain. Its official story says itâs part of the Decentralized Science (DeSci) movement-a buzzword for using blockchain to make science more open and collaborative. Specifically, ONC says it wants to break down the walls between cancer researchers, patients, and the public. Sounds good on paper.
But hereâs the problem: thereâs no evidence itâs doing any of that.
Thereâs no public team behind it. No names. No organizations. No LinkedIn profiles. No research papers. No partnerships with hospitals, universities, or labs. The official website? A single landing page with vague mission statements and no functional platform. No dashboard. No data uploads. No way for a researcher to submit findings or for a patient to contribute health data. Itâs just a webpage with a token contract attached.
The numbers donât lie
As of December 4, 2025, ONC has a total supply of 1 billion tokens. Only 700 million are in circulation. That sounds like a lot-until you look at the price. Itâs trading around $0.00026. That gives it a market cap of about $182,000. For comparison, the entire DeSci sector is worth over $2 billion. ONC makes up less than 0.01% of it.
Hereâs the kicker: the 24-hour trading volume is $0. Zero. Across CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, and Bybit, not a single trade happened in the last day. That means nobodyâs buying or selling. Not even speculators. If a coin has no volume, itâs not a market-itâs a graveyard.
Even worse, the top 10 holders control over 42% of the circulating supply. Thatâs extreme concentration. It means a handful of wallets could dump their tokens at any time and crash the price. And they have every incentive to do so-thereâs no utility keeping the price up.
Where you canât buy it
You wonât find ONC on Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, or any major exchange. The only places itâs listed are obscure decentralized exchanges like Uniswap or SushiSwap, and even then, trading it is a nightmare. Slippage is 15-20%. That means if you try to buy $100 worth, you might end up paying $120 because thereâs so little liquidity. Many users report failed transactions. Others say their wallets show the tokens, but they canât move them.
And forget about staking, earning rewards, or using it in any app. Thereâs no ecosystem. No wallet integration. No mobile app. No browser extension. Nothing.
What the experts say
Dr. Elena Rodriguez, a blockchain researcher at MIT Media Lab, put it bluntly: âProjects like Oncology Network that promise to revolutionize complex medical research through tokenization often lack the scientific infrastructure to deliver meaningful impact.â
Mark Johnson, a DeSci analyst at CoinTelegraph, gave ONC a 2.1 out of 10. His breakdown? No GitHub activity since January 2024. No public roadmap updates since November 2024. No partnerships. No team. Just a token and a dream.
Even Dr. Michael Chen from MD Anderson Cancer Center-who sees potential in the *idea* of blockchain for oncology research-said ONCâs execution is âquestionable.â He didnât endorse the token. He just said the concept *could* work if done right. ONC isnât doing it right.
What users are saying
Reddit threads are full of warnings. One top post titled âAvoid this scam coinâ has over 140 upvotes. Users describe it as a âclassic rug pull.â Trustpilot has 12 reviews with an average of 1.2 stars. The most recent one says: âZero communication from team. Website hasnât updated since launch.â
There are 3,420 wallet holders, but most of them are either early buyers who bought near the all-time low of $0.00003 or people who got it as part of airdrops. Very few hold it because they believe in the mission. Most are just hoping to sell to someone else at a higher price.
One user, u/HodlForCure, wrote: âI believe in the mission even if the tokenomics seem questionable.â Thatâs the only real sentiment left. But belief doesnât pay bills. And it doesnât fund cancer research.
Why this matters beyond crypto
This isnât just about losing money on a bad coin. Itâs about how easily people can exploit compassion. Cancer touches nearly every family. When a project uses that pain to sell a token, itâs not just unethical-itâs dangerous. It distracts from real efforts. Real researchers at institutions like the Mayo Clinic or Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center are using blockchain in meaningful ways-with peer-reviewed studies, institutional backing, and transparent data sharing. ONC isnât one of them.
Itâs a distraction. A noise. A scam dressed up as a cause.
Is ONC worth investing in?
No.
Thereâs no utility. No development. No team. No volume. No future roadmap. No institutional support. The only thing ONC has is a name that sounds noble.
If youâre looking to support cancer research, donate to a verified nonprofit. If you want to use crypto for science, look at projects with actual research outputs, public GitHub activity, and academic partnerships. ONC has none of those.
Itâs not a revolution. Itâs not even a startup. Itâs a ghost.
Is Oncology Network (ONC) a real cryptocurrency?
Yes, ONC is a real token on the Ethereum blockchain with a verifiable contract address. But being real doesnât mean itâs legitimate or functional. It has no utility, no team, and almost no trading activity. It exists technically, but not practically.
Can I use ONC to support cancer research?
No. Thereâs no mechanism for ONC to fund or connect with real cancer research. No research institutions accept it. No clinical trials use it. No data platforms run on it. The projectâs website doesnât even have a way to submit or track research. Itâs just a token with a hopeful name.
Why is the trading volume $0?
Because no one wants to trade it. Thereâs no reason to buy it, no way to use it, and no confidence that it will ever have value. The few people who hold it are either holding onto hope or waiting to dump it. Without buyers or sellers, volume stays at zero.
Is ONC listed on Binance or Coinbase?
No. Binance explicitly states that ONC is not listed for trading or services. Coinbase, Kraken, and other major exchanges also donât list it. You can only buy it on small, unreliable decentralized exchanges with high risk and poor liquidity.
Should I buy ONC because itâs cheap?
Buying a coin because itâs cheap is one of the riskiest moves in crypto. ONC is cheap because itâs worthless. A low price doesnât mean itâs undervalued-it means nobody believes in it. The all-time high was $0.035. Thatâs 134 times higher than todayâs price. If you bought at the top, youâd be down 99%. Buying now wonât change that-it just makes you part of the last group holding the bag.
What happened to the ONC roadmap?
The original whitepaper promised things like âQ3 2024: Clinical trial integrationâ and âQ1 2025: Researcher dashboard.â None of those happened. The GitHub repo hasnât had a commit since January 2024. The Twitter account hasnât posted since November 2024. The roadmap is dead. The project is frozen.
Is ONC a scam?
It fits the pattern of a rug pull: anonymous team, no progress, zero volume, concentrated ownership, and a noble cause used as marketing. While no legal action has been taken (partly because the market cap is too small to attract regulators), the signs are textbook. Most users and analysts agree: itâs not a project-itâs a speculation trap.
Are there better DeSci alternatives to ONC?
Yes. Projects like $RNDR (Render Network) and $GMT (StepN) have real-world use cases, active development, and institutional backing. In the DeSci space, look for tokens tied to actual research institutions, published studies, and transparent governance. ONC has none of that. Donât confuse a name with a mission.
michael cuevas
So let me get this straight - a token with zero trades, no team, and a website that looks like it was built in 2017 is supposed to cure cancer? đ€Ą Iâd rather donate to a GoFundMe run by my cousinâs neighborâs dog walker.
Nina Meretoile
I just want to believe in something good đ But when compassion gets turned into a trading pair... it breaks my heart. Maybe the real cure is kindness, not crypto. đ±â€ïž
Elizabeth Miranda
The lack of any verifiable team or technical progress is alarming. This isnât just a bad investment - itâs a failure of ethical accountability in the DeSci space. The absence of transparency isnât an oversight; itâs a red flag.
Chloe Hayslett
America doesnât need some foreign ghost coin pretending to fight cancer. Real science happens in labs, not on Uniswap. This is what happens when you let crypto bros play doctor.
Jonathan Sundqvist
I saw this thing pop up on my feed last year. Thought it was a joke. Turned out it wasnât. People actually bought it. I donât know whether to laugh or cry.
Annette LeRoux
Itâs sad how easy it is to monetize suffering. People want to feel like theyâre helping - and scammers know that. ONC isnât a project. Itâs a psychological exploit wrapped in blockchain jargon.
Manish Yadav
This is why India doesnât trust crypto. Everyone wants to get rich off someone elseâs pain. No respect. No ethics. Just greed. I hope the SEC shuts this down before someone dies because they believed the hype.
ronald dayrit
The deeper issue here isnât just the token - itâs the normalization of performative activism through financial instruments. Weâve moved from donating to a cause to speculating on its emotional resonance. The tokenization of empathy is a symptom of a system that commodifies everything, even human suffering. When compassion becomes a liquidity pool, weâve lost something fundamental.
Yzak victor
I get why people get drawn to this. I really do. Cancer hits too close to home for too many. But if youâre gonna throw money at something, at least make sure itâs not vaporware. There are legit DeSci projects out there - go find them.
Madison Agado
The fact that this even exists says more about our culture than about blockchain. Weâd rather believe in a magic token than confront how broken healthcare funding really is.
Tisha Berg
Iâve seen people lose their savings on this. Itâs not just about money. Itâs about hope being manipulated. We need better education around this stuff - not just warnings.
Roseline Stephen
The contract address is real. The team isnât. The mission sounds noble. The execution is nonexistent. Thatâs the definition of a ghost project.
Richard T
Iâm curious - has anyone actually tried to contact the team? Or is everyone just assuming theyâre gone because thereâs no Twitter?
Mariam Almatrook
One cannot help but observe the profound epistemological dissonance inherent in the conflation of financial speculation with altruistic medical advancement. The ontological status of ONC is thus rendered as a semiotic phantom - a signifier without a referent, a token devoid of telos.
rita linda
This is why you donât let crypto bros near anything medical. They think âdecentralizedâ means âno accountabilityâ. Itâs not innovation - itâs negligence dressed up as disruption.
Martin Hansen
You people are so naive. If you think a token with no team and zero volume is going to cure cancer, you deserve to lose your money. Iâm not even mad - Iâm just disappointed in humanity.
Frank Cronin
This isnât a scam. Itâs a *performance art piece* about how desperate people are to believe in miracles. And honestly? Itâs working. Congrats, ONC - youâve outsmarted the entire crypto community with a landing page and a dream.
miriam gionfriddo
i just lost 3k on this thing and now i feel like a fool đ the website still says âcoming soonâ like its 2022 and i swear to god if i see one more âjoin our missionâ banner im gonna scream
Kenneth Ljungström
Iâm not saying itâs legit, but... what if the team just vanished because they got sick? Maybe they were real and got overwhelmed? I mean, cancer does that to people too.
Tom Van bergen
You think this is bad? Wait till you see the AI cancer-diagnosis NFTs dropping next quarter. Theyâll be minted on Solana and powered by blockchain-powered stethoscopes. The future is now.