Crypto Sanctions: How Governments Block Crypto Access and Who Gets Hit

When governments impose crypto sanctions, official restrictions on cryptocurrency use to cut off funding for rogue states, criminals, or sanctioned entities. Also known as cryptocurrency embargoes, these measures target wallets, exchanges, and even stablecoins tied to illicit networks. It’s not about banning Bitcoin—it’s about cutting off the pipes that let bad actors move money without oversight.

Take Russian crypto sanctions, U.S. actions targeting exchanges like Garantex and Grinex, plus the A7A5 stablecoin used to launder over $8 billion. These weren’t random. They followed a trail: North Korean hackers cashing out via fake remote jobs, Iranian traders using decentralized bridges, and Russian elites moving funds through non-KYC platforms. The U.S. Treasury didn’t just freeze accounts—they shut down entire infrastructure chains. And it’s not just Russia. Countries like Nigeria and Singapore now require licenses just to handle crypto, turning compliance into a barrier to entry.

Crypto laundering, the process of disguising illegal crypto proceeds to look legitimate is the main reason these sanctions exist. Whether it’s mixing coins, using privacy protocols, or exploiting under-regulated chains, bad actors always find a way. But governments are catching up. The AML rules crypto, anti-money laundering requirements forcing exchanges to verify users and track transactions are now stricter than ever. In the UK, you can’t operate without FCA registration. In Malta, you need a license just to touch crypto. Even DeFi platforms aren’t safe—those with zero volume and no audits are being flagged as high-risk.

Stablecoins are the new battleground. Stablecoin restrictions, bans or scrutiny on tokens like USDT, USDC, or niche ones like A7A5 used to bypass controls are rising fast. Why? Because they’re the easiest way to move value across borders without banks. But when regulators盯上 them, they don’t just ban the token—they go after the people behind it. That’s why you see exchanges like Garantex vanish overnight, not because of a hack, but because their operators were named in sanctions lists.

What does this mean for you? If you’re trading on unregulated platforms, holding obscure tokens, or using services with no KYC, you’re already in the crosshairs—even if you didn’t do anything illegal. The system doesn’t care about intent. It cares about patterns. And right now, the pattern is clear: unlicensed, anonymous, and untracked crypto flows get blocked. The posts below show exactly how this plays out: dead meme coins tied to shell companies, exchanges that vanished after sanctions hit, and stablecoins that were never real to begin with. You won’t find hype here. Just facts about who got shut down, why, and what to watch for next.

24Nov

P2P Crypto Trading Volumes in Restricted Countries: What’s Really Happening in 2025

Posted by Peregrine Grace 8 Comments

P2P crypto trading thrives in restricted countries despite sanctions and bans. In 2025, OFAC actions, exchange pullouts, and wallet freezes have reshaped the market-making trading harder but not impossible.